←back to thread

118 points blondie9x | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jandrewrogers ◴[] No.43673380[source]
Anecdotally, among the people I know in Seattle, many people who have happily been in the same relationship for decades are not married. People are not avoiding long-term relationships, they are avoiding the baggage and fairly rigid assumptions that comes with state intervention in their relationships. There is zero social pressure to be “officially” married so people have no reason to do it for the sake of social conformity. Both men and women are subscribing to this.

I think some of this is a side-effect of many people planning to never have children.

replies(6): >>43673492 #>>43673502 #>>43673584 #>>43673777 #>>43674021 #>>43689641 #
willidiots ◴[] No.43673584[source]
One thing to be mindful of is that this limits your ability to help your partner as you age. State intervention can play both ways.
replies(4): >>43673605 #>>43673639 #>>43673788 #>>43673800 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.43673639[source]
It’s actually the opposite. A lot of benefits programs are punitive to marriage wrt household income. I know many older couples who stay unmarried because one of them would lose their healthcare or cash transfer benefit, for example.

For making healthcare decisions, durable power attorney and a medical proxy should be sufficient for unmarried couples. Not an attorney, talk to one if this is a need you have to validate your authority posture. The best time to have a plan is before you need it.

replies(2): >>43674114 #>>43678209 #
1. ◴[] No.43678209[source]