←back to thread

191 points shibaobun | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.272s | source
Show context
coldblues ◴[] No.43668550[source]
I still feel like Roam Research did it best. Conor was truly a pioneer in the digital note taking field. I still miss the times when all of it was new, it was so exciting and everything felt revolutionary. A lot of Roam users are still using it even though the pricing hasn't changed a bit and neither has the design, but I don't think there's anything better even now. Zettelkasten is severely underrated and misunderstood. Notion and Evernote are disgusting, and PARA is a nonsensical grift. If you need more context regarding that, I recommend reading Conor's Twitter threads and watching interviews and livestreams featuring him.
replies(6): >>43668571 #>>43668793 #>>43669677 #>>43670087 #>>43670149 #>>43673099 #
packetlost ◴[] No.43668793[source]
I would be more inclined to use it if there was offline support and it wasn't so expensive. I used (and really really like) Logseq for awhile but have since moved to Obsidian. I'd switch if there was a strong reason to.
replies(1): >>43670540 #
fmos ◴[] No.43670540[source]
Why and how did you switch from Logseq to Obsidian?
replies(2): >>43672571 #>>43674397 #
1. packetlost ◴[] No.43674397[source]
Bugs and performance mostly. The elusive database refactor might bring me back but we'll see.

I definitely have a preference for outliner, flat zk style, but I'm able to get the majority of the benefit from Obsidian while having access to a stronger ecosystem of plugins and first class publishing and syncing support. Meanwhile Logseq seems to have lost a lot of steam.