←back to thread

71 points susam | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.612s | source
Show context
HexDecOctBin ◴[] No.43673899[source]
Why is it that Pascal is supposedly so good for Rapid Application Development? Is it simply a historical accident, or does Pascal have some features that make it easier? What features would need to be added to C to make C a viable language for RAD?
replies(7): >>43673957 #>>43673971 #>>43674284 #>>43674335 #>>43674504 #>>43674573 #>>43676653 #
1. AdrianB1 ◴[] No.43674335[source]
At the time it appeared, it was more powerful than BASIC or COBOL. We learned Pascal in college and even the technically less inclined colleagues were able to do the assignments pretty well. We used Turbo Pascal, which had a decent IDE, my brother also continued to use Delphi for another ~ 10 years and loved it for being so easy to do some quick and dirty things when needed. Honestly I don't remember almost any details after 30 years, other than it was simple to use and quick to learn and write something in it, while a lot more friendly than C or C++.
replies(1): >>43674360 #
2. api ◴[] No.43674360[source]
A huge amount of BBS software from the classic pre-Internet BBS era was written in Borland Turbo Pascal.
replies(1): >>43674457 #
3. AdrianB1 ◴[] No.43674457[source]
I ran a BBS for a few years in 1992-1994, at some point running under OS/2, but honestly I never bothered to find out the programming language used for it, there was no source code attached and all the software at that time was pirated.