←back to thread

118 points blondie9x | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.43s | source
Show context
api ◴[] No.43673389[source]
Seattle, meaning the city, right?

When people get married and think about settling down and maybe having kids, they usually leave high cost of living cities. They want stability, something they can own or rent long term, and usually more space, especially if kids are coming.

Sometimes they move to the suburbs, sometimes across the country.

The only people who stay tend to be rich people who can actually afford to get some space and stability in the city. Even then many of those decide to leave anyway for other reasons, again especially if they want kids.

High cost city centers are basically an extension of college dorms at this point. They are where people go to start their careers or level up, not stay.

This is like saying “study shows that most people in a shopping mall are looking to buy something” then extrapolating some larger conclusion from that.

replies(2): >>43673552 #>>43673857 #
ghaff ◴[] No.43673552[source]
People, especially couples, moving out of cities as they get older has been a thing for decades. You’d think young urbanites would welcome this.
replies(1): >>43673861 #
1. trollbridge ◴[] No.43673861[source]
It means heavy car dependence unless you expect people to change careers when they have a family. Hence the modern American cityscape, with most the population spread out amongst suburbs.
replies(1): >>43674011 #
2. ghaff ◴[] No.43674011[source]
A lot of the jobs are in the suburbs (finance being something of an exception). A lot of the tech industry is in car-reliant suburbs. I live in Massachusetts and, until west coast firms established outposts in Boston/Cambridge and pharma basically took over Kendall Square, there was basically no tech industry in Boston for a couple decades.

And, yes, outside of Manhattan and young people essentially living like they did in college for a few years, car dependency is just what most people do.