←back to thread

1210 points jbegley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bawolff ◴[] No.43658003[source]
The missing part of this article: are the requests valid? Are they actually incitements to terrorism and violence or is it just a clamp down on criticism? The headline of the article implies the latter but the body does not provide any evidence for that.

Like there is a war going on, a pretty nasty one at that. I would expect there to be quite a lot of incitement to violence related to that. I would expect the israeli government to be mostly concerned with incitements of violence against its citizens. In the context of this conflict i would expect such incitements to be mostly be made by the demographics cited in the article due to the nature of the conflict. The article seems like it could be entirely consistent with take downs being used appropriately. It needs more then this to prove its headline.

Heck, from this post we dont even know relative numbers. How does this compare against take down requests from other groups?

replies(10): >>43658099 #>>43659314 #>>43660724 #>>43660804 #>>43662269 #>>43662614 #>>43662636 #>>43673364 #>>43674847 #>>43678221 #
janalsncm ◴[] No.43658099[source]
If you have valid rules but in practice only enforce them against a single group, then in some sense you are asking the wrong question.

In other words, for people who assume rule enforcement is supposed to be fair, they see unfair enforcement as hypocrisy. However, if you just see enforcement as another tool to wield against enemies, hypocrisy is irrelevant. What matters is power. It’s my basketball, I make the rules.

replies(1): >>43658201 #
bawolff ◴[] No.43658201[source]
> If you have valid rules but in practice only enforce them against a single group

I'd agree. Is there any evidence that that is happening here? The article reports on israeli take down requests but does not report on take down requests from other groups. Meta could very well be using the same rules against pro-israel groups, we just dont know because the leak didn't include that information.

replies(2): >>43662934 #>>43673398 #
MasterIdiot ◴[] No.43662934{3}[source]
anecdotally Meta has pretty lax moderation against anti-palestinian in Hebrew, allowing tons of extremely racist/violent speech.
replies(1): >>43673317 #
1. xg15 ◴[] No.43673317{4}[source]
Yeah, probably because it's Hebrew and no one outside Israel will read it anyway.