/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Anubis Works
(xeiaso.net)
313 points
evacchi
| 9 comments |
12 Apr 25 22:32 UTC
|
HN request time: 1.39s
|
source
|
bottom
Show context
namanyayg
◴[
12 Apr 25 23:37 UTC
]
No.
43668799
[source]
▶
>>43668433 (OP)
#
"It also uses time as an input, which is known to both the server and requestor due to the nature of linear timelines"
A funny line from his docs
replies(2):
>>43668898
#
>>43682007
#
1.
xena
◴[
12 Apr 25 23:55 UTC
]
No.
43668898
[source]
▶
>>43668799
#
OMG lol I forgot that I left that in. Hilarious. I think I'm gonna keep it.
replies(2):
>>43668938
#
>>43668964
#
ID:
GO
2.
mkl
◴[
13 Apr 25 00:05 UTC
]
No.
43668938
[source]
▶
>>43668898 (TP)
#
BTW Xe,
https://xeiaso.net/pronouns
is 404 since sometime last year, but it is still linked to from some places like
https://xeiaso.net/blog/xe-2021-08-07/
(I saw "his" above and went looking).
replies(1):
>>43669031
#
3.
didgeoridoo
◴[
13 Apr 25 00:12 UTC
]
No.
43668964
[source]
▶
>>43668898 (TP)
#
I didn’t even blink at this, my inner monologue just did a little “well, naturally” in a Redditor voice and kept reading.
4.
xena
◴[
13 Apr 25 00:24 UTC
]
No.
43669031
[source]
▶
>>43668938
#
I'm considering making it come back, but it's just gotten me too much abuse so I'm probably gonna leave it 404-ing until society is better.
replies(2):
>>43669504
#
>>43676065
#
5.
cendyne
◴[
13 Apr 25 02:16 UTC
]
No.
43669504
{3}
[source]
▶
>>43669031
#
That's what route-specific Anubis is for.
replies(1):
>>43670253
#
6.
frontalier
◴[
13 Apr 25 05:13 UTC
]
No.
43670253
{4}
[source]
▶
>>43669504
#
parent is referring to a different kind of abuse
replies(1):
>>43671275
#
7.
1oooqooq
◴[
13 Apr 25 09:06 UTC
]
No.
43671275
{5}
[source]
▶
>>43670253
#
or you just not cranking up the required proof of work effort enough.
8.
IsTom
◴[
13 Apr 25 21:40 UTC
]
No.
43676065
{3}
[source]
▶
>>43669031
#
Maybe there is some space on the market for a Proof of Emapthy widget
replies(1):
>>43685978
#
9.
ranger_danger
◴[
14 Apr 25 20:30 UTC
]
No.
43685978
{4}
[source]
▶
>>43676065
#
I have seen some projects that require acknowledging certain politically-charged statements before they will allow you to participate, like "you must agree that sovereign country X is at war with aggressor country Y".
↑