←back to thread

200 points Larrikin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
obviyus ◴[] No.43665405[source]
I tried this for a while with ErsatzTV and really loved it. I don’t have cable anymore but I remember fond memories of cycling through channels as a child.

I set up a food channel that would cycle through Masterchef and a few travel cooking shows, one for anime and one for Bollywood movies.

It was incredibly enjoyable. I could just put on a channel after work without having to consciously make a decision on what to watch. Just watch whatever’s on the channel and switch over to something else if it didn’t click!

Definitely going to try this out on my NAS.

replies(4): >>43665500 #>>43666034 #>>43666505 #>>43675058 #
thakoppno ◴[] No.43666034[source]
> fond memories of cycling through channels as a child

One thing that’s missing is the low-latency old analog systems had changing channels. Has anyone figured out a way to achieve this in the digital era?

replies(1): >>43666189 #
joezydeco ◴[] No.43666189[source]
I worked on a DVB-H receiver back in the day and we tried to speed it up by having a complete second tuner in hardware and starting the acquisition on the next stream while decoding the first one.
replies(1): >>43666377 #
thakoppno ◴[] No.43666377[source]
That’s fun. I suppose flipping up channels is far more common than down, but presumably one direction would be faster with this solution.
replies(2): >>43666968 #>>43672991 #
1. justinsaccount ◴[] No.43666968[source]
Not really. the definition of what the 'next' stream is could easily change depending on what the last button you pressed, with the assumption that you would continue pressing that button:

  * up - next stream is one more channel up
  * down - next stream is one more channel down
  * last/prev - next stream is the previous channel.