←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
553 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 1.397s | source
Show context
_kush ◴[11 Apr 25 15:21 UTC] No.43654871[source]▶
A reminder that photopea.com is a great photoshop alternative and it's web-based
replies(2): >>43655653 #>>43665177 #
1. mxuribe ◴[12 Apr 25 15:23 UTC] No.43665177[source]▶
Was about to mention photopea as well...I should add that i'm by no means a person who uses this type of software on a regular basis....But whenever i need it i reach for either GIMP or photopea, and last few years, its been photopea far more often.

Honestly, i wish Adobe would still offer the conventional license, but with an additional hosting option that consumer can *choose* to activate and pay more for, or not...so that, basically:

* I pay a one-time license to use photoshop offline - and for however long i wish (understanding that after its end of life i may not eligible for security updates, but that's fair)

* Now, for storing of files, i would need to of course store them locally on my machine.

* But, if i *chose* to pay an ongoing subscription, that is when Adobe would host files for me....so i can still use their product offline, and they only charge me for use of online file storage...and i wouldn't mind if there were a premium on that charge, since i get that i would be paying for an ongoing storage service.

That gives me choice, it gives them money (both for licensing and ongoing hosting subscription), and i would figure everyone would be content....

...but, i guess the current world does not work that way, eh? So, i guess i will continue to avoid their products, heading towards alternatives like photopea, Gimp, etc.