←back to thread

1210 points jbegley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
googlryas ◴[] No.43656769[source]
I'd like to see examples of actual posts that were taken down, rather than talk of the quantity, or who filed the reports.
replies(8): >>43656909 #>>43657070 #>>43657074 #>>43657102 #>>43657375 #>>43657555 #>>43658974 #>>43659655 #
nashashmi ◴[] No.43657555[source]
Every pro Palestinian protestor has experienced some form of awareness suppression and content removal. They have known this was a thing long before anyone else did.

Same thing happened during 9/11. Muslims saw suppression, bullying by the police and no one covered it. Then the tables turned on maga republicans after j6.

replies(1): >>43658984 #
dijit ◴[] No.43658984[source]
I’m too stupid to navigate this topic in anything other than a crude and adolescent way, however I think it could be tricky for pro-palestinians because they can fall easily into the trap of using party slogans used by proscribed organisations.

My understanding of Hamas is that they are not considered a legitimate army, but if they were they would be guilty of an insurmountable number of war crimes (not unlike the IDF as many would say). Showing support for such things is beyond reasonable accepted discourse in my home country.

replies(3): >>43659688 #>>43660161 #>>43661766 #
throw310822 ◴[] No.43659688[source]
> it could be tricky for pro-palestinians because they can fall easily into the trap of using party slogans used by proscribed organisations

Any excuse is good when you have power and want to justify repression. For example they tried to claim that the slogan "from the river to the sea Palestine will be free" is genocidal. Quite a jump. (Meanwhile, the Likud's platform says "from the river to the sea there will be only Israel" but that's fine).

> if they were they would be guilty of an insurmountable number of war crimes

They killed much less civilians than the IDF did, and they are not invaders nor illegal occupiers of someone else's country. What is acceptable or unacceptable is decided by those who are in power, and they are currently protecting a country whose prime minister in charge is wanted for crimes against humanity.

replies(2): >>43663514 #>>43665965 #
1. jl6 ◴[] No.43663514[source]
> For example they tried to claim that the slogan "from the river to the sea Palestine will be free" is genocidal.

It’s actually just German for “The Bart, The”.