←back to thread

Google is winning on every AI front

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
993 points vinhnx | 1 comments | 12 Apr 25 03:58 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Lukman ◴[12 Apr 25 06:42 UTC] No.43661923[source]▶
In my experience Claude 3.7 is far superior for coding than Gemini 2.5. I tried it in Cursor and I wanted it to work, as a recent ex-Googler. I repeatedly found it inferior. I think it’s still behind Claud 3.5 for coding.

It would decide arbitrarily not to finish tasks and suggest that I do them. It made simple errors and failed to catch them.

replies(6): >>43661938 #>>43661985 #>>43661988 #>>43662194 #>>43662360 #>>43662583 #
1. Kholin ◴[12 Apr 25 08:00 UTC] No.43662360[source]▶
Same here. I've seen some articles and LLM benchmarks that Gemini 2.5 Pro is better than Claude 3.7 on coding, but base on my recent experience of solving code problems with two products, Claude still gave me better answer, Gemini response are more detail and well structured, but less accurate.