←back to thread

Google is winning on every AI front

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
993 points vinhnx | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.078s | source | bottom
1. Waterluvian ◴[] No.43662026[source]
> I felt Demis Hassabis was trustworthy in a way Sam Altman couldn't be—a true scientist, not a businessman

Not that I think Demis is or is not trustworthy, but I think it’s a bit foolish to believe it would be allowed to matter.

replies(2): >>43662167 #>>43665223 #
2. eru ◴[] No.43662167[source]
I also don't see why scientists should be more trustworthy than business people.
replies(2): >>43662250 #>>43662546 #
3. procaryote ◴[] No.43662250[source]
In theory, one seeks knowledge, the other money.

In practice, people are people and there are probably variance in both camps, but it's easy to see why one would by default trust a business person less

replies(1): >>43670021 #
4. blitzar ◴[] No.43662546[source]
I also don't see why doctors should be more trustworthy than used car sales people.
replies(1): >>43662739 #
5. logicchains ◴[] No.43662739{3}[source]
The opiod epidemic should have taught people that indeed doctors shouldn't be trusted more than any other profession.
replies(1): >>43664199 #
6. QuadmasterXLII ◴[] No.43664199{4}[source]
your trust scale needs more dynamic range- the sackler fiasco genuinely should have bumped everyone’s trust in doctors a lot, but probably should not have bumped them below supplement peddling minecraft youtubers.
7. tim333 ◴[] No.43665223[source]
It's already made some difference to how the companies are behaving - Deepmind doing quite a lot of work on protein folding and now protein drug interactions, OpenAI under Altman tying to do the startup max the money raised and user count thing.
8. eru ◴[] No.43670021{3}[source]
> In theory, one seeks knowledge, the other money.

There's nothing wrong with either in my books, especially if you seek money by serving your fellow humans.