←back to thread

121 points tylerg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
zahlman ◴[] No.43659511[source]
Okay, but like.

If you do have that skill to communicate clearly and describe the requirements of a novel problem, why is the AI still useful? Actually writing the code should be relatively trivial from there. If it isn't, that points to a problem with your tools/architecture/etc. Programmers IMX are, on average, far too tolerant of boilerplate.

replies(5): >>43659634 #>>43659667 #>>43659773 #>>43660939 #>>43661579 #
simonw ◴[] No.43659634[source]
Once you've got to a detailed specification, LLMs are a lot faster at correctly typing code than you are.
replies(3): >>43659854 #>>43660451 #>>43662888 #
zahlman ◴[] No.43659854[source]
In your analysis, do you account for the time taken to type a detailed specification with which to prompt the LLM?

Or the time to review the code - whether by manual fixes, or iterating with the prompt, or both?

replies(1): >>43659983 #
simonw ◴[] No.43659983[source]
No, just the time spent typing the code.
replies(2): >>43660176 #>>43660546 #
recursivegirth ◴[] No.43660176[source]
Time to first iteration is a huge metric that no one is tracking.
replies(1): >>43661083 #
1. r0b05 ◴[] No.43661083[source]
Could you explain this please?