←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
553 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
shaky-carrousel ◴[11 Apr 25 15:05 UTC] No.43654619[source]▶
What a great idea, scaring companies probing bluesky. That surely won't backfire and will cement bluesky as a Xitter alternative.
replies(15): >>43654681 #>>43654704 #>>43654706 #>>43654713 #>>43654856 #>>43654876 #>>43654883 #>>43655006 #>>43655007 #>>43656703 #>>43658986 #>>43659171 #>>43659817 #>>43660073 #>>43660650 #
miohtama ◴[11 Apr 25 15:09 UTC] No.43654681[source]▶
Bluesky audience is certain kind, more left leaning, finding corporations evil. Adobe's experiment shows that it is unlikely any big corp could go there any time until the audience is more diverse, less cancel culture.
replies(8): >>43654716 #>>43654754 #>>43654760 #>>43654780 #>>43654795 #>>43654891 #>>43654972 #>>43655176 #
0xEF ◴[11 Apr 25 15:46 UTC] No.43655176[source]▶
> more diverse, less cancel culture

I love when people use this to mean "more white and conservative."

Bluesky users lean toward hating corporate greed. Adobe is greedy as fuck. Simple as. They and companies like them can stay off.

replies(2): >>43655211 #>>43658273 #
1. pessimizer ◴[11 Apr 25 20:39 UTC] No.43658273[source]▶
Bluesky is far whiter than Twitter. So diverse here would mean "less white."