←back to thread

553 points bookofjoe | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.019s | source
Show context
add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.43654633[source]
This was fascinating to see unfold. What if there was a social network that had taste and rejected things that suck?

Is it a failure of Bluesky to never become the global town square, if it means being a place where a brand can't find it a safe space to promote itself?

Can a social network thread the needle of having enough traffic to be worthwhile but not so much as to attract the Eternal September?

replies(3): >>43655014 #>>43655308 #>>43659747 #
cryptopian ◴[] No.43655308[source]
Maybe a better question is whether we even need a global town square. I've had Twitter and Bluesky and the difference between them and a real town square is that you're always performing publically to an audience you can't possibly know. I've found far more rewarding relationships posting on niche forums and even subreddits because you get a sense of the people who use and administrate them, and you're safe in the knowledge you can't easily find virality.
replies(1): >>43655486 #
1. add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.43655486[source]
I agree, it's just that the town square will exist regardless because of the billions of people and the propensity of most of them to gravitate to the most mainstream option. It feels ideal that that's quarantined on Twitter so the more niche spaces stay high quality.
replies(1): >>43661480 #
2. fmxsh ◴[] No.43661480[source]
The town square is the mainstream's niche.