←back to thread

Playing in the Creek

(www.hgreer.com)
346 points c1ccccc1 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
profsummergig ◴[] No.43651005[source]
Requesting someone to please explain the "coquina" metaphor.
replies(5): >>43651071 #>>43651073 #>>43651084 #>>43651280 #>>43651415 #
ern ◴[] No.43651280[source]
Maybe I’m not smart enough, or too tired to decode these metaphors, so I plugged the essay into ChatGPT and got a clear explanation from 4o.
replies(2): >>43651887 #>>43652491 #
criddell ◴[] No.43652491[source]
Are you at all concerned that plugging stuff like this into ChatGPT is leaving you with weaker cognitive muscles? Or is it more similar to what people do when they see a new word and reach for their dictionary?
replies(2): >>43652812 #>>43656156 #
adwn ◴[] No.43652812[source]
> Are you at all concerned that plugging stuff like this into ChatGPT is leaving you with weaker cognitive muscles?

Couldn't this very same argument have been used against any form of mental augmentation, like written language and computers? Or, in an extended interpretation, against any form of physical augmentation, like tool use?

replies(2): >>43653365 #>>43654152 #
criddell ◴[] No.43653365[source]
You can argue whatever you want to argue.

I make my living with my brain so I do worry about the downsides of removing boredom and mental struggle from my days.

replies(2): >>43653975 #>>43654314 #
1. steve_adams_86 ◴[] No.43654314[source]
Me too.

There is another side to this, which is maybe we don’t need to know a lot of things.

It was true with search engines already, but maybe truer with LLMs. That thing you’re querying probably doesn’t actually matter. It’s neurotic digging and searching for an object you will never use or benefit from. The urge to seek is strong but you won’t find the thing you’re searching for this way.

You might learn more by just going for a walk.