←back to thread

160 points cruzcampo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
snehk ◴[] No.43651672[source]

> Yet to many Europeans the idea that free expression is under threat seems odd. Europeans can say almost anything they want, both in theory and in practice.

A journalist in Germany was just sentenced to seven months for posting a meme of a politician where she holds up a sign saying "I hate free speech".

https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/nancy-faeser-afd-...

replies(14): >>43651681 #>>43651723 #>>43651744 #>>43651745 #>>43651760 #>>43651765 #>>43651767 #>>43651769 #>>43651825 #>>43651851 #>>43651872 #>>43652301 #>>43652854 #>>43654946 #
croes ◴[] No.43651825[source]

He didn't post a meme, he posted a altered picture which made it look like the politician really said that.

That's called defamation.

Just because he later claimed it's satire doesn't make it satire.

replies(3): >>43651963 #>>43654362 #>>43655333 #
Ukv ◴[] No.43651963[source]

I believe this is the picture in question (and original): https://www.gbnews.com/media-library/nancy-faeser-photo-befo...

Seven months for that seems insane to me. It looks far more like a meme/satire than an attempt to create a realistic fake, given it's just pure-black impact font and an implausible message ("I hate freedom of speech!") to be holding up on a sign.

replies(2): >>43652069 #>>43652145 #
croes ◴[] No.43652069[source]

You have to consider the target audience, they believe German culture gets erased because a discounter sells chocolate bunnies as sitting bunnies instead of Easter bunnies while the leaflet is full of Easter named articles and Milka sells its chocolate bunny under the name Schmunzelhase (Smiling bunny) for decades.

In these circles, false quotes have been repeated as true again and again for years.

A simple “satire” in the article would not have been enough, but it would have had the same effect.

replies(2): >>43652268 #>>43653006 #
1. ◴[] No.43653006[source]