/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Remember FastCGI? (2021)
(brokenco.de)
53 points
heavensteeth
| 1 comments |
08 Apr 25 12:00 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.353s
|
source
Show context
mhd
◴[
11 Apr 25 10:58 UTC
]
No.
43652509
[source]
▶
>>43620676 (OP)
#
Sure, but does anyone remember
SCGI
?
replies(2):
>>43652808
#
>>43654464
#
1.
dfox
◴[
11 Apr 25 11:54 UTC
]
No.
43652808
[source]
▶
>>43652509
#
In my opinion that was step in the right direction, but the protocol design is truly weird. Somehow managing to come up with 4 different ways to encode length of byte strings in otherwise so simple protocol is remarkable achievement.
ID:
GO
↑