←back to thread

395 points pseudolus | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
_tom_ ◴[] No.43640954[source]
No one seems to be talking about the fact that we need to change the definition of cheating.

People's careers are going to be filled with AI. College needs to prepare them for that reality, not to get jobs that are now extinct.

If they are never going to have to program without AI, what's the point in teaching them to do it? It's like expecting them to do arithmetic by hand. No one does.

For every class, teachers need to be asking themselves "is this class relevant" and "what are the learning goals in this class? Goals that they will still need, in a world with AI".

replies(7): >>43641128 #>>43641222 #>>43641227 #>>43641380 #>>43641503 #>>43641550 #>>43642488 #
chrisvalleybay ◴[] No.43641380[source]
I believe we need to practice critical thinking through actual effort. Doing arithmetic by hand and working through problems ourselves builds intuition in ways that shortcuts can't. I'm grateful I grew up without LLMs, as the struggle to organize and express my thoughts on paper developed mental muscles I still rely on today. Some perspiration is necessary for genuine learning—the difficulty is actually part of the value.
replies(1): >>43641659 #
1. oerdier ◴[] No.43641659[source]
Critical thinking is not a generic/standalone skill that you can practise targetedly. As in, critical thinking doesn't translate across knowledge domains. To think critically you need extensive knowledge of the domain in question; that's one reason why memorizing facts will always remain necessary, despite search engines and LLMs.

At best what you can learn specifically regarding critical thinking are some rules of thumb such as "compare at least three sources" and "ask yourself who benefits".

replies(1): >>43641810 #
2. stevenhuang ◴[] No.43641810[source]
I think you'd find many would disagree with each of those claims.
replies(2): >>43641937 #>>43642130 #
3. oerdier ◴[] No.43641937[source]
I hope they'll apply the critical thinking rule of thumb to check for themselves what modern research has to say on this!

Edit: And how can you critically assess if that research is any good? To do it well you need... domain knowledge.

4. SiempreViernes ◴[] No.43642130[source]
And would they amount to a larger number than those who oppose vaccines?