←back to thread

How University Students Use Claude

(www.anthropic.com)
395 points pseudolus | 1 comments | 09 Apr 25 15:41 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
_tom_ ◴[10 Apr 25 05:34 UTC] No.43640954[source]▶
No one seems to be talking about the fact that we need to change the definition of cheating.

People's careers are going to be filled with AI. College needs to prepare them for that reality, not to get jobs that are now extinct.

If they are never going to have to program without AI, what's the point in teaching them to do it? It's like expecting them to do arithmetic by hand. No one does.

For every class, teachers need to be asking themselves "is this class relevant" and "what are the learning goals in this class? Goals that they will still need, in a world with AI".

replies(7): >>43641128 #>>43641222 #>>43641227 #>>43641380 #>>43641503 #>>43641550 #>>43642488 #
1. tgv ◴[10 Apr 25 07:27 UTC] No.43641550[source]▶
That's such an irresponsible take. If you don't know how to program, you can't even begin to judge the output of whatever model. You'll be the idiotic manager that tells the IT department to solve some problem, and it has to be done in two weeks. No idea if that's reasonable or feasible. And when you can't do that, you certainly can't design a larger system.

What's your next rant: know nead too learn two reed and right ennui moor? Because AI can do that for you? No need to think? "So, you turned 6 today? That over there is your place at the assembly line. Get to know it well, because you'll be there the rest of your life."

> For every class, teachers need to be asking themselves "is this class relevant" and "what are the learning goals in this class?

That's already how schools organize their curriculum.