←back to thread

180 points gnabgib | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sitkack ◴[] No.43636938[source]
PSA, everyone should be getting the HPV vaccine, regardless of age and gender.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HPV_vaccine

https://www.mdanderson.org/publications/focused-on-health/wh...

https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/oropharyngeal-cancer.html

replies(10): >>43637174 #>>43637565 #>>43637753 #>>43637969 #>>43638326 #>>43638655 #>>43638679 #>>43638750 #>>43638758 #>>43638803 #
offmycloud ◴[] No.43638758[source]
> PSA, everyone should be getting the HPV vaccine, regardless of age and gender.

This is false, please don't take medical advice from an HN post. CDC guidelines do include quite a bit of discussion of patient age. [1]

1. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/hcp/recommendations.htm...

replies(5): >>43638853 #>>43638868 #>>43639195 #>>43639231 #>>43640496 #
colechristensen ◴[] No.43638853[source]
Either the vaccine has notable safety issues or it should be at least fine to get the vaccine at an older age.

The reason many people don't trust the CDC's advice is they don't really tell you why or why not.

If you're over 26 you're pretty likely to already be exposed to HPV but not necessarily every strain which would be protected by the vaccine (as it says in the article).

So this pushes the question: why shouldn't I get it even if there's only a small chance it will be beneficial at my age? Is there really a risk they're not telling me about or are they giving bullshit answers? There isn't a third direction.

replies(1): >>43638993 #
js2 ◴[] No.43638993[source]
Vaccine recommendations are based on more than just safety. Efficacy, cost, availability, and prioritization are also considerations.

> Compared with the benefit of the existing HPV vaccination program for adolescents and young adults through age 26 years, the additional benefit of vaccinating people age 27 through 45 years would be minimal.

> Given abundant evidence for safety of HPV vaccines, undesirable anticipated effects are minimal. Also, anticipated population-level benefits are minimal for vaccinating adults over age 26 years. In this scenario, other considerations including cost-effectiveness play an important role in guiding policy-making.

https://www.cdc.gov/acip/evidence-to-recommendations/HPV-adu...

Elsewhere:

> There’s not a safety issue past age 45. We just aren’t sure how much the vaccine will help men and women who are past that age, because so many of us have acquired HPV by that point, and because it takes many years for cancer to develop after acquiring the virus. However, as the average life expectancy increases, it may benefit the population to increase the age limit for HPV vaccination as well.

https://www.mskcc.org/news/think-you-re-too-old-get-hpv-vacc...

replies(1): >>43639108 #
1. Angostura ◴[] No.43639108[source]
Yeh. The NHS has a pretty focussed set of criteria https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/hpv-vaccine/