←back to thread

259 points zdw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.289s | source
Show context
thrtythreeforty ◴[] No.43635458[source]
Impulse response is sort of overkill here. If you design a filter bank in the first place, you can just implement that filter bank much cheaper than doing even an FFT-based convolution. Convolution is useful when you don't know the underlying filter transfer function.
replies(5): >>43635799 #>>43636182 #>>43636622 #>>43637141 #>>43637264 #
1. gmueckl ◴[] No.43637141[source]
This depends entirely on the length of the impulse response, doesn't it? A very short time domain convolution isn't actually more computationally expensive than a bank of crossover filters.