←back to thread

689 points taubek | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.517s | source
Show context
JSR_FDED ◴[] No.43631980[source]
It’s like people excited about the new datacenter being built in their town, think of all the jobs that will bring they cry. Nobody realizes it takes 6 people to run a datacenter.

Bringing “manufacturing back to the US” is a fool’s errand. The future of manufacturing is automation, not jobs.

replies(14): >>43632283 #>>43632300 #>>43632333 #>>43632356 #>>43632390 #>>43632872 #>>43632937 #>>43633742 #>>43634455 #>>43634730 #>>43635013 #>>43636738 #>>43636871 #>>43645775 #
rayiner ◴[] No.43632937[source]
> Bringing “manufacturing back to the US” is a fool’s errand. The future of manufacturing is automation, not jobs.

That’s probably correct. But the current trajectory means that China will have the robot-operated factories, not the US. What do you anticipate the US will do to obtain goods from those Chinese factories? Especially when AI stands poised to obsolete a lot of the white collar jobs where the US still retains a competitive edge?

You can’t treat the reserve dollar as something that will perpetually defy physics. The pound used to be the world’s reserve currency not too long ago. There’s no reason for the world to continue flocking to dollars when other economies surpass the US.

replies(2): >>43635191 #>>43636481 #
1. ibeff ◴[] No.43636481[source]
> China will have the robot-operated factories, not the US. What do you anticipate the US will do to obtain goods from those Chinese factories?

Why not let the market take care of it? It's cheaper to buy things from China then make them yourself. When that changes, production will naturally move to the next best place. I don't see the issue.

replies(3): >>43636774 #>>43637079 #>>43642142 #
2. chrisco255 ◴[] No.43636774[source]
Because China doesn't share the same goals, desires, or policies we do. They will have the power and cards to dictate world policy if you roll over and let them dominate. Realpolitik matters here. You either dominate the future (or at least stay competitive) or you become a vassal state.
3. rayiner ◴[] No.43637079[source]
Because no economic theory proposes that the efficient outcome is one where the US retains its sovereignty and independence. Nations seek to create bubbles of local maximums, not in maximizing the economic efficiency of the world as a whole. A world where american kids have to learn chinese and fight to immigrate to China may well be an economically efficient outcome from the point of view of the markets. But American policy should fight very hard against that outcome.
4. beeflet ◴[] No.43642142[source]
Because I don't want the chinese to control the world.