←back to thread

628 points kiyanwang | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
notrealyme123 ◴[] No.43630255[source]
https://web.archive.org/web/20250409082704/https://endler.de...

Otherwise rate limited

replies(3): >>43630333 #>>43630385 #>>43630537 #
hk__2 ◴[] No.43630537[source]
The best programmers I know don’t use cheap hosting that rate-limit your static blog.
replies(5): >>43630579 #>>43630690 #>>43631030 #>>43631104 #>>43632893 #
1. reverendsteveii ◴[] No.43632893[source]
I certainly would. Getting blasted w traffic because of an insightful post is an edge case that it doesn't make sense to design around and I'm not really gonna want my personal blog to be a time or money sink when I could be spending either on things that I like more than that. So I'm gonna go with the free tier of something that provides basic protection and availability and if I do get hug-of-death'd by some content aggregator or another it's no real loss to me that they use the wayback machine rather than hit my page directly because I'm not monetizing.