←back to thread

182 points evilpie | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
davidmurdoch ◴[] No.43630753[source]
Firefox really needs to fix their CSP for extensions before this kind of thing.

Here is the 9 year old bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1267027

And their extension store does not permit workarounds, even though they themselves have confirmed it's a bug.

replies(4): >>43630784 #>>43630796 #>>43630948 #>>43630984 #
Semaphor ◴[] No.43630784[source]
Having fewer permissions for extensions than one might want seems fairly less important to making the browser more secure…
replies(2): >>43631143 #>>43641315 #
joshuaissac ◴[] No.43631143[source]
Arguably, it can make it less secure by reducing the user's control over what content the browser loads or what scripts it executes. For example, users may be using extensions to selectively replace harmful content (like intrusive JavaScript, tracking) with benign content. It is a balance between security for the user and security for the website owner.
replies(2): >>43631244 #>>43633386 #
1. gear54rus ◴[] No.43631244{3}[source]
Exactly. It's been clearly established that web extensions' code is more priveleged than a page code, as it should be. The amount of people going 'muh sesoority' in this thread is baffling.