←back to thread

655 points louis-paul | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.28s | source | bottom
1. wg0 ◴[] No.43629260[source]
Start looking for alternatives already. Nothing good came out of VC rounds and private equity for the end consumers ever.
replies(1): >>43629293 #
2. sidcool ◴[] No.43629293[source]
I understand the cynicism. But this is counter productive. Any venture has to have a finance angle. They are not missionaries.
replies(5): >>43629710 #>>43629766 #>>43630502 #>>43630817 #>>43662218 #
3. LunaSea ◴[] No.43629710[source]
Sure, but amounts matter.
4. wg0 ◴[] No.43629766[source]
All in for profitability and financial activity. That's the very foundation of innovation.

But VC funding works very differently.

5. BiteCode_dev ◴[] No.43630502[source]
Steam does fine financially and without having to answer investors, which is why it's been able to stay mostly good to its user base for so long.

This is not an "xor" statement.

replies(1): >>43631193 #
6. afroboy ◴[] No.43630817[source]
What's wrong with Steam (Valve) business model?
7. wg0 ◴[] No.43631193{3}[source]
So is Basecamp. Profitability is not a dirty word.
8. mbs159 ◴[] No.43662218[source]
VC funding is on a whole other level, though