←back to thread

666 points jcartw | 9 comments | | HN request time: 1.257s | source | bottom
Show context
SwiftyBug ◴[] No.43620583[source]
I've been living in Brazil for the last 20 years.

Pix revolutionised the way we transact in Brazil. I've used Pix to pay for things that cost only cents, and I have a friend who bought her house using Pix. The system just works for any transfer amount. And it's so easy to use.

Its speed is truly baffling, and so is its reliability. Never have I failed to make a Pix payment because of downtime. I never cease to be amazed by how fast money arrives in my Brazilian account when I make a withdrawal directly from my EUR wallet on Wise. I receive a push notification from my Brazilian bank before Wise finishes running the animation of confirmation of withdrawal. It's like magic.

And it's so widespread that nowadays I don't even question whether someone accepts Pix. When I get in a taxi, no matter how old the driver is, it's certain that they take (and prefer) Pix.

I've even had homeless people ask me for Pix instead of change on multiple occasions.

Cryptocurrencies don't stand a chance.

replies(32): >>43620618 #>>43620630 #>>43620653 #>>43620658 #>>43620741 #>>43620818 #>>43620824 #>>43620883 #>>43620954 #>>43621164 #>>43621188 #>>43621341 #>>43621460 #>>43621833 #>>43621851 #>>43622093 #>>43622233 #>>43622479 #>>43622501 #>>43622627 #>>43622888 #>>43623111 #>>43623692 #>>43624345 #>>43624424 #>>43624538 #>>43626843 #>>43627268 #>>43627624 #>>43628278 #>>43629343 #>>43630864 #
WinstonSmith84 ◴[] No.43624538[source]
> Cryptocurrencies don't stand a chance.

Now, try to use Pix outside of Brazil - it's not even used in other Mercosur countries, what's the chance of having that adopted in other countries... And, that's problem #1.

How much do you trust your government with your money? A system like Pix don't stand a chance to get a worldwide adoption - maybe people are naive but governments won't unify to adopt a common system controlled by just a single entity / country.

What we may however end up with, are dozens of systems like Pix, one for each country, union, etc. Still cryptocurrencies as-is remain relevant (see point 1)

replies(25): >>43625367 #>>43625375 #>>43625647 #>>43626773 #>>43626927 #>>43627273 #>>43627295 #>>43627393 #>>43627721 #>>43628266 #>>43628397 #>>43628617 #>>43628632 #>>43629104 #>>43629151 #>>43629239 #>>43629613 #>>43629873 #>>43630034 #>>43630698 #>>43631142 #>>43631269 #>>43631814 #>>43632631 #>>43635833 #
toomuchtodo ◴[] No.43626927[source]
80 countries have instant/real time payment systems today [1], and the Bank for International Settlements is working on cross border interoperability [2].

Cryptocurrencies will likely never go away, and will remain in use for certain use cases from a cross border value transfer perspective, similar to gold; either the token moves or the ownership is updated. More interesting is offering digital wallets for a single or basket of currencies to anyone you can remotely identity proof in the world (similar to nsave [3]).

[1] https://www.volt.io/real-time-payments-world-map/

[2] https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/fmis/nexus.htm

[3] https://www.nsave.com/ | https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/nsave

replies(2): >>43627319 #>>43629375 #
danielmarkbruce ◴[] No.43627319[source]
On top of that, the BIS isnt even needed for global real time payments. A company like Wise (formerly transferwise) or any similar entity can just hold accounts in each country and if the local settlement is real time they can also do real time global settlement by just updating their db and sending the money real time in the receiving location.
replies(3): >>43627572 #>>43628108 #>>43629270 #
1. FearNotDaniel ◴[] No.43628108[source]
> Wise (formerly transferwise)

Off-topic, but: this is possibly one of the world's dumbest rebranding exercises. I forget now how many years ago they made the change, but I've never heard anyone outside the company itself refer to it as just "Wise" without adding "(formerly transferwise)".

replies(4): >>43628597 #>>43628819 #>>43629386 #>>43631069 #
2. FabHK ◴[] No.43628597[source]
Runner up: Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy)
3. danielmarkbruce ◴[] No.43628819[source]
someone somewhere needed a promo...
4. _rm ◴[] No.43629386[source]
Followed by gross new brand styling

Could've at least gone with calling themselves "Wise.com" or something, like "Make.com" does.

Got nothing on "X" though. Have yet to hear someone in person say "on X" rather than "on Twitter".

replies(1): >>43629552 #
5. riffraff ◴[] No.43629552[source]
Really? You don't like the pea-soup on vomit color scheme?

I've been a loyal user of wise for more than a decade, since I used them to pay for my cross-currency wedding, and I can accept the name change since they wanted to show they were more than just money transfer (but just make it "bankwise", ffs), but the new brand style was a disaster.

Notice they dialed it down over time,it's now more neutral than at launch, so someone must have listened to the complaints.

replies(1): >>43631124 #
6. tim333 ◴[] No.43631069[source]
I think it's kind of a status thing that you can afford a short word domain like wise.com. But yeah, in conversation I still call them transferwise.
7. tim333 ◴[] No.43631124{3}[source]
I've been with them a while also and haven't noticed a huge change apart for switching the colour from blue to green?

Site from 4 years ago "The cheap, fast way to send money abroad" https://web.archive.org/web/20210305145221/https://wise.com/

vs now "Send money globally for less" wise.com

replies(1): >>43631373 #
8. riffraff ◴[] No.43631373{4}[source]
They also switched to the peculiar slanted round font ("wise sans"), and padded every page with whitespace so it has a much lower information density. The actual experience past login never had much so yeah it's not as much a change as the public branding.

But mostly, it's the light-green-on-dark-green text which I dislike, and I _think_ they dialed down its usage compared to e.g. the brand announcement[0] and how the blog looks[1] compared to the main site. Then again, de gustibus.

[0] https://wise.com/community/en/brand-new-look [1] https://wise.com/gb/blog/welcoming-libby-to-the-board

replies(1): >>43633714 #
9. tim333 ◴[] No.43633714{5}[source]
Oh yeah, the second one [1] is kind of ugly.