←back to thread

655 points louis-paul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tmpz22 ◴[] No.43624557[source]
If they had taken just say $40 million would they be able to sustain their project for the foreseeable future and perhaps not yield as much future product direction and equity?

I honestly don't know how this big dealmaking works but it strikes me that when you take out this big of an obligation that the obligation has a gravity that may drag you in a direction you (or consumers) do not want to go.

Love Tailscale as a product (as does everyone I talk to) but genuinely want to learn more about the trade-offs as usually when we see big dollar signs all we do is celebrate.

replies(6): >>43624690 #>>43625018 #>>43625510 #>>43626138 #>>43626140 #>>43626489 #
1. pc86 ◴[] No.43626140[source]
I'd be curious how much of this $160 million is immediately allocated to bonuses, founders taking money off the table, increased salaries, employee option pools, etc.