←back to thread

163 points mariuz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mwkaufma ◴[] No.43618250[source]
On ABZÛ we ripped out multiplayer and lots of other cruft from AActor and UPrimitiveComponent - dropping builtin overlap events, which are a kind of anti pattern anyway, not only saved RAM but cut a lot of ghost reads/writes.
replies(6): >>43618358 #>>43618532 #>>43619035 #>>43619088 #>>43621863 #>>43624533 #
thaumasiotes ◴[] No.43619035[source]
Your presence inspired me to try to look up what the circumflex on "abzû" is supposed to signify. As best I can tell, it's a marker of vowel length.

I wonder how that came to be used. It's a traditional way to distinguish eta and omega in transliteration from Greek, but it's not at all a traditional way to mark long vowels in general.

(I see that wikipedia says this about Akkadian:

> Long vowels are transliterated with a macron (ā, ē, ī, ū) or a circumflex (â, ê, î, û), the latter being used for long vowels arising from the contraction of vowels in hiatus.

But it seems odd for an independent root to contain a contracted double vowel. And the page "Abzu" has the circumflex on the Sumerian transliteration too.)

replies(2): >>43619371 #>>43625337 #
1. mananaysiempre ◴[] No.43625337[source]
Seems to be an older convention in linguistics. Romanizations of Japanese also switched from circumflexes (Tôkyô) to macrons (Tōkyō) at some point in time fairly long ago—I think the English-language Japanese journal I saw using that convention systematically was from the late 1950s, and its recent issues definitely don’t use it.

Perhaps a circumflex was easier to typeset, like with logicians switching from Ā to ¬A and the Chomskyan school in linguistics switching from X-bar and X-double-bar to X' and XP?