←back to thread

177 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
bwb ◴[] No.43622606[source]
I am excited to see the next 20 years :)
replies(2): >>43623200 #>>43623419 #
nxm ◴[] No.43623200[source]
China keeps adding coal power plants like no other and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future
replies(8): >>43623271 #>>43623329 #>>43623436 #>>43623926 #>>43624447 #>>43624624 #>>43624821 #>>43627000 #
jasonsb ◴[] No.43623329[source]
They add coal as peaking power plants. They're not planning to run the grid on coal.
replies(1): >>43624256 #
timeon ◴[] No.43624256[source]
In context of climate change, absolute values of CO2 are still more relevant than proportion in generated energy.
replies(1): >>43624570 #
1. itishappy ◴[] No.43624570[source]
Somewhat, but proportional/per-capita becomes more relevant when you allow for changing standards of living.

Put differently: Unless you have a plan to change the number of people on Earth (please don't) or the amount of power required per person (potentially viable), then proportional and absolute are essentially equivalent.