←back to thread

655 points louis-paul | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.282s | source | bottom
1. burningion ◴[] No.43624080[source]
Tailscale is a great. I think of it as a swiss army knife for easier routing and connectivity.

I use it in projects to stream internet / connectivity from my phone to the NVIDIA Jetson line, making my robotics projects easily accessible / debuggable:

https://github.com/burningion/bicyclist-defense-jetson?tab=r...

replies(2): >>43624395 #>>43624611 #
2. syntaxing ◴[] No.43624395[source]
Off topic but rerun.io is really cool. Never heard of it until I saw your project. Do you know if it does "replay" kinda like rosplay?
replies(2): >>43624738 #>>43625010 #
3. tonyarkles ◴[] No.43624611[source]
That was our initial use case for Tailscale as well. May 2020 we started growing a team and needed a really smooth remote access solution for a bunch of Xaviers... and we weren't allowed to be in the same room together :)
4. burningion ◴[] No.43624738[source]
Yes, rerun does replay, that was my main use case when prototyping.

They've since raised more funding recently, and have larger use cases in mind for robotics: https://rerun.io/blog/physical-ai-data

I've spoken with members of the team, and they're all great. Wouldn't hesitate to use the product / work with them anywhere.

replies(1): >>43625089 #
5. ilrwbwrkhv ◴[] No.43625010[source]
+1 rerun is great and they also make egui.rs, one of the best immediate mode graphics libs.
6. syntaxing ◴[] No.43625089{3}[source]
I can't seem to find the replay function. As in replaying the sensor data as if it was "live". Would you happen to have a link to this feature?
replies(1): >>43626806 #
7. nikonp ◴[] No.43626806{4}[source]
Rerun co-founder here. Rerun doesn’t have replay in the sense of you send messages in and can play back the same messages in the same order later. We have playback in the sense that you can play it back in the viewer. We also have apis for reading back data but its more focused on dataframe use cases rather than sending you back messages
replies(1): >>43627308 #
8. syntaxing ◴[] No.43627308{5}[source]
Thanks for the clarification!