https://assets.msn.com/content/view/v2/Detail/en-in/AA1CsokD
NB. It wasn't Apple who moved to block the secrecy of the hearing. Apple seems content to let UK Apple computer owners mistakenly believe they can trust the company's promises of "privacy". Meanwhile the company was participating in secret hearings with the government concerning computer owners' data.
"The ADP service is opt-in, meaning people have to sign up to get the protection it provides."
Defaults matter. They are intentional. They are chosen by so-called "tech" companies like Apple that interlope as alleged "necessary" intermediaries: "Send us your data and we will store it in our data centres."
Apple's default is "no end-to-end encryption". ADP off.
The judgment referenced in the submission is only the "public" one, a summary. Apple will not publish the "private" one.
The data at issue is not Apple's. But the data owners are absent from these hearings. Their only knowledge of how the "data custodian" Apple advocates, negotiates and capitulates on their behalf comes from vague publicity and the custodian itself.