←back to thread

177 points belter | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.665s | source | bottom
Show context
nitrix ◴[] No.43623360[source]
Okay, but put the panels on rooftops, not over that nice greenery.
replies(5): >>43623457 #>>43623479 #>>43623519 #>>43623588 #>>43623920 #
1. atlantic ◴[] No.43623519[source]
It's not "over" greenery. Land is entirely cleared of vegetation before panels are installed, including the occasional forest. Thousands of larger birds are killed by wind farms. Offshore wind farms are creating deserts for fish. Understandably, many prefer the good old days before the planet was being saved.
replies(5): >>43623533 #>>43623665 #>>43623695 #>>43624237 #>>43624928 #
2. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.43623533[source]
Why would they prefer the older methods that do more land damage and kill even more animals?
3. recursive ◴[] No.43623665[source]
Wait until you find out what fracking and oil drilling do.
4. krn1p4n1c ◴[] No.43623695[source]
DWs recent doc showed fish thriving around offshore farms and high success rates of preventing bird strikes by painting the blades.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3395_T1N-fo

5. mrexroad ◴[] No.43624237[source]
Can you cite the offshore wind farm induced fish desert? I’d be interested to understand the dynamics.
6. bmicraft ◴[] No.43624928[source]
Have you seen what just mining coal does too a landscape? I don't think so.

The only reason for that is that coal isn't new and thus not reported on in the news.