←back to thread

666 points jcartw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
afarah1 ◴[] No.43620640[source]
WhatsApp is omnipresent for communication in Brazil, and WhatsApp Pay was ready before Pix, but the government blocked the launch to launch Pix first.[1] I rarely see this mentioned.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/brazil-suspends-w...

replies(6): >>43620718 #>>43620799 #>>43620932 #>>43621079 #>>43621305 #>>43622632 #
paintbox ◴[] No.43620799[source]
It's a question of national security not to let Meta eat that cake, and Brasil made the right choice.

Tangentially related, I've heard talk of EU alternative to VISA and Mastercard, which I also believe is the right direction.

replies(4): >>43620888 #>>43620945 #>>43623107 #>>43628923 #
afarah1 ◴[] No.43620945[source]
WhatsApp Pay is available today in Brazil. The official reason for blocking the launch was missing paperwork, but word on the street at the time was that it was to favor Pix. This is all mentioned in the Retuers article. The reasons for favoring Pix are left for one to speculate. You say national security, the other says financial surveillance and control over the population. Time will tell.
replies(4): >>43621045 #>>43621094 #>>43621247 #>>43627233 #
xinayder ◴[] No.43621045[source]
I'd much rather let the Central Bank handle my instant payments, than Meta.
replies(2): >>43621101 #>>43622430 #
1. afarah1 ◴[] No.43621101[source]
So do most Brazilians, as today that choice is available. It's interesting how being the first to launch contributed to that preference, regardless of the widespread usage of WhatsApp. There are other interesting factors to consider. For example, a lot of people had WhatsApp but no bank account. As mentioned in The Economist's article there have been changes to the banking sector brought by Pix as well. Anyway, an interesting case study, and that's why I mentioned it.