←back to thread

169 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
noworld ◴[] No.43620370[source]
The successor IBM Mainframes are still alive... for the time being.

https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg248329.pdf

replies(2): >>43620494 #>>43623210 #
froh ◴[] No.43620494[source]
oh, they'll stay around for another while.

they also moved on three more CPU generations since that redbook, to z17.

I think it's Linux on Z that makes it sexy and keeps it young, in addition to a number of crazy features, like a hypervisor that can share CPUs between tenants, and a hardware that support live migration of running processes between sites (via fibre optic interconnect) and the option to hot swap any parts on a running machine.

It's doing a number of things in hardware and hypervisor that need lots of brain power to emulate on commodity hardware.

_and_ it's designed for throughput, from grounds up.

Depending on your workload there may be very good economical reasons to consider a mainframe instead of a number of rack-frames.

replies(7): >>43620580 #>>43620589 #>>43620617 #>>43620927 #>>43621478 #>>43621799 #>>43623708 #
1. trollbridge ◴[] No.43620589[source]
Other than IBM’s absurdly high pricing, they’re cheaper to run in almost every way than x86 machines (including cloud). I haven’t done the math to compare with aarch64/ARM.

But most people don’t want to deal with the hassle of dealing with IBM.