←back to thread

Less Htmx Is More

(unplannedobsolescence.com)
169 points fanf2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
kolektiv ◴[] No.43620012[source]
It is amazing how quickly a simple, traditional, "collection of pages" type website actually works if you don't do annoying things to slow it down. Most websites would be absolutely fine if a) HTTP was used reasonably well to set things like cache headers, and so (as mentioned in the article) and b) if a load of user-irrelevant stuff like tracking and advertising code wasn't thrown in as well. A simple page with standard HTML, passably optimised assets where needed, and only the JS needed for actual functionality, should be almost instant on most modern connections.
replies(3): >>43620362 #>>43620363 #>>43620930 #
1. weinzierl ◴[] No.43620363[source]
> "Like any new tool, especially a tool that got popular as quickly as htmx, there are differing schools of thought on how best to use it."

If so, it's not because for lack of a written down philosophical framework. See Hypermedia Systems by Carson et al.

https://hypermedia.systems/