←back to thread

579 points paulpauper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
wg0 ◴[] No.43609507[source]
Unlike many - I find author's complaints on the dot.

Once all the AI batch startups have sold subscriptions to the cohort and there's no more further market growth because businesses outside don't want to roll the dice on a probabilistic model that doesn't have an understanding of pretty much anything rather is a clever imitation machine on the content it has seen, the AI bubble will burst when more statups would start packing up by end of 2026 or max 2027.

replies(1): >>43612749 #
consumer451 ◴[] No.43612749[source]
I would go even further than TFA. In my personal experience using Windsurf daily, Sonnet 3.5 is still my preferred model. 3.7 makes many more changes that I did not ask for, often breaking things. This is an issue with many models, but it got worse with 3.7.
replies(3): >>43612845 #>>43612928 #>>43616646 #
1. Zetaphor ◴[] No.43616646[source]
I finally gave up on 3.7 in Cursor after three rounds of it completely ignoring what I asked it for so that it could instead solve an irrelevant linter error. The error in no way affected functionality.

Despite me rejecting the changes and explicitly telling it to ignore the linter it kept insisting on only trying to solve for that