←back to thread

182 points yarapavan | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
aadhavans ◴[] No.43614405[source]
A very well-written piece. The section on funding open source is as relevant as it's ever been, and I don't think we've learnt much since last year.

As the proportion of younger engineers contributing to open-source decreases (a reasonable choice, given the state of the economy), I see only two future possibilities:

1. Big corporations take ownership of key open-source libraries in an effort to continue their development.

2. Said key open-source libraries die, and corporations develop proprietary replacements for their own use. The open source scene remains alive, but with a much smaller influence.

replies(5): >>43614635 #>>43615318 #>>43615592 #>>43616293 #>>43618059 #
1. throw83848484 ◴[] No.43615592[source]
Sadly, as OS dev, I see third way: development behind closed doors.

With AI and CV reference hunting, number of contributions is higher than ever. Open-source projects are basically spammed, with low quality contributions.

Public page is just a liability. I am considering to close public bugzilla, git repo and discussions. I would just take bug reports and patches from very small circle of customers and power users. Everything except release source tarball, and short changelog would be private!

Open-source means you get a source code, not free customer and dev support!