←back to thread

361 points Tomte | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Scaevolus ◴[] No.43584261[source]
Ultimately, RAW formats aren't that complex, and camera firmware is mostly developed in countries that don't have strong open source software traditions.

Look at the decoders for each format that darktable supports here: https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed/tree/develop/src/l...

It's some binary parsing, reading metadata, maybe doing some decompression-- a thousand lines of C++ on average for each format. These aren't complex codecs like HEVC and only reach JPEG complexity by embedding them as thumbnails!

Cameras absolutely could emit DNG instead, but that would require more development friction: coordination (with Adobe), potentially a language barrier, and potentially making it harder to do experimental features.

Photographers rarely care, so it doesn't appreciably impact sales. Raw processing software packages have generally good support available soon after new cameras are released.

replies(12): >>43607682 #>>43608468 #>>43609020 #>>43609118 #>>43609169 #>>43609799 #>>43612739 #>>43612940 #>>43615274 #>>43615505 #>>43617505 #>>43624875 #
weinzierl ◴[] No.43609169[source]
I always thought camera RAW formats were optimize continuous shooting rates. About being able to linearly write an image as fast as possible.

I don't know the details of DNG but even the slightest complication could be a no-go for some manufacturers.

replies(6): >>43609317 #>>43609319 #>>43609787 #>>43609926 #>>43610281 #>>43611179 #
1. donatzsky ◴[] No.43610281[source]
DNG is a TIFF file, just like most proprietary raw formats.