←back to thread

157 points pmags | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.326s | source | bottom
Show context
jqpabc123 ◴[] No.43608411[source]
Is there some benefit here for Trump voters?

I don't see it.

But then again, I don't see how a trade war against the world is going to "Make America Great Again" either. It is much more likely to do the opposite.

replies(7): >>43608470 #>>43608505 #>>43608588 #>>43608680 #>>43608736 #>>43608825 #>>43608978 #
1. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.43608588[source]
Promote Christian values; abortion is bad, and STDs have the stigma of promiscuous behaviour. Treating STDs and having abortions available encourages promiscuity.

(not my views, oversimplified take on fundamentalists and project 2025)

replies(1): >>43608664 #
2. milesrout ◴[] No.43608782[source]
Isn't the simple answer to that question just to look at history?

It is no coincidence that the rising availability of contraception coincided with the swinging 60s.

replies(1): >>43608798 #
3. youngtaff ◴[] No.43608798{3}[source]
And what contraception facilitated the orgies of Roman times?
replies(2): >>43608844 #>>43608857 #
4. kelnos ◴[] No.43608816[source]
If we look back in time we find that promiscuous behavior and dangerous back-alley abortions existed well before STI treatment and safe, legal abortions.

But no, I don't value "chastity" or -- to phrase it more accurately -- denying women control over what happens with their own bodies.

People should have lots of sex! Sex is great!

5. RealityVoid ◴[] No.43608844{4}[source]
Silphium? /s
6. ahoef ◴[] No.43608857{4}[source]
They did not follow modern Christian values. Sex was looked on differently, as was parenthood, and adoption.

Also, contraception did exist in those times.