←back to thread

E.U. Prepares Major Penalties Against X

(www.nytimes.com)
139 points dotcoma | 1 comments | 06 Apr 25 17:47 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
dionidium ◴[06 Apr 25 18:49 UTC] No.43603902[source]▶
> Blue checkmarks "used to mean trustworthy sources of information," Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton said.

Obviously you can write a law that says anything you want, but as an aesthetic matter, this strikes me as pretty ridiculous. A company makes up a thing called a "blue checkmark" and then, what, it has to mean the same thing for the rest of all time? It's not like the new Twitter lied about what was happening. They said plainly that they were changing the checkmark system to mean something new. Why would anybody cheer a government stepping in to say, "no, sorry, you can't do that?"

replies(6): >>43603959 #>>43604023 #>>43604345 #>>43604359 #>>43606563 #>>43607023 #
1. Zigurd ◴[07 Apr 25 01:25 UTC] No.43606563[source]▶
There's at least a little bit of strawman-ing going on here.

The regulators are not insisting that blue checkmarks mean what they've always meant. Secondly xitter hasn't been transparent about changes to blue checkmarks. There was a long period of time when blue checkmarks were given or even forced upon credible sources at Elon's whim while he sold them to hucksters and frauds. Even if blue checkmarks had been that debased throughout their existence, there's still plenty of basis for regulators to find that they are deceptive.