←back to thread

174 points andy99 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
3eb7988a1663 ◴[] No.43603491[source]
Maybe the headline should note that this a parser vulnerability, not the format itself. I suppose that is obvious, but my first knee-jerk thought was, "Am I going to have to re-encode XXX piles of data?"
replies(2): >>43603869 #>>43604836 #
brokensegue ◴[] No.43603869[source]
What would it mean for the vulnerability to be in the format and not the parser?
replies(3): >>43603925 #>>43603966 #>>43606334 #
1. jonstewart ◴[] No.43606334[source]
That data had to be encoded in a certain way which would lead to unavoidable exploitation in every conforming implementation. For example, PDF permits embedded JavaScript and… that has not gone well.