←back to thread

174 points andy99 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.404s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.43604427[source]
Broken record, but "has a CVSS score of 10.0" is literally meaningless. In fact, over the last couple years, I've come to take vulnerabilities with very high CVSS scores less seriously. Remember, Heartbleed was a "7.5".
replies(5): >>43604810 #>>43605410 #>>43606314 #>>43609363 #>>43610358 #
1. pclmulqdq ◴[] No.43605410[source]
I am pretty convinced that CVSS has a very significant component of "how enterprise is it." Accepting untrusted parquet files without verification or exposing apache spark directly to users is a very "enterprise" thing to do (alongside having log4j log untrusted user inputs). Heartbleed sounded too technical and not "enterprise" enough.
replies(1): >>43607573 #
2. positr0n ◴[] No.43607573[source]
> alongside having log4j log untrusted user inputs

I'd think logging things like query parameters is extremely common.