←back to thread

139 points dotcoma | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
twalkz ◴[] No.43603601[source]
I guess at some point the EU has to do something if they want companies to keep implementing these regulations under the calculus of “cost of implementation vs. cost of fines that arise from non-compliance”.

I would love to believe that some companies would follow these regulations even without severe threat, because they’re the right thing to do for users, but I know in a lot of cases it can take significant time, effort, and money to keep up with every regulation coming out of the EU

replies(4): >>43603619 #>>43603776 #>>43603778 #>>43604442 #
onlyrealcuzzo ◴[] No.43603619[source]
Companies don't really care about "the right thing to do for users."

They care about maximizing profits from you.

If you're hoping companies are going to "do the right thing for you" on their own, you're probably going to be disappointed.

replies(2): >>43603748 #>>43603780 #
fullshark ◴[] No.43603748[source]
Once upon a time these companies valued their user base, afraid they would leave and find another way to use their time. I guess they’ve got the data that their users are all addicted and will never do that. At least until they push too hard.
replies(4): >>43603797 #>>43603818 #>>43603829 #>>43604212 #
1. palata ◴[] No.43604212[source]
> Once upon a time these companies valued their user base

Because that's what was bringing profit then. We should never forget, that's the whole point of capitalism: companies maximize profit. Companies are not human beings with emotions, they are profit-maximizing entities.

They evolve in a framework set by regulations. The society, made of human beings with emotions, is supposed to define that framework in such a way that what makes companies profitable is also good for the people.