←back to thread

US labour watchdog halts Apple cases after group’s lawyer picked for top job

(www.ft.com)
275 points belter | 4 comments | 02 Apr 25 11:50 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
rchaud ◴[04 Apr 25 13:15 UTC] No.43581873[source]▶
Apple CEO Tim Cook made a personal $1 million "donation" to the Trump inauguration in January 2025:

> Cook, a proud Alabama native, believes the inauguration is a great American tradition, and is donating to the inauguration in the spirit of unity, the sources said.

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/03/tim-cook-apple-donate-1-mil...

replies(5): >>43583474 #>>43583651 #>>43584196 #>>43584405 #>>43585798 #
CalChris ◴[04 Apr 25 15:16 UTC] No.43583651[source]▶
Did Cook, in the spirit of unity, make a similar donation in 2020?
replies(4): >>43584684 #>>43584798 #>>43585435 #>>43585526 #
1. crazygringo ◴[04 Apr 25 16:36 UTC] No.43584798[source]▶
Presumably not, because that administration wasn't corrupt and wasn't demanding those kinds of things.
replies(1): >>43590436 #
2. lenkite ◴[05 Apr 25 03:27 UTC] No.43590436[source]▶
Did you also call Obama's inaugural funding as corruption, when he was donated $53 million in 2009 and ~$43 in 2013 ?

Did you also call Biden's inaugural funding as corruption when he was donated ~$62 million ?

Donations included several billionaires - including the Gates family.

Is raising Presidential inaugural funds considered as "corruption" only for one party ? Or only when it crosses ~$100 million like President Trump did ?

replies(1): >>43592543 #
3. dragon-hn ◴[05 Apr 25 11:32 UTC] No.43592543[source]▶
> Or only when it crosses ~$100 million like President Trump did ?

I believe you missed another option. The President-elect has been convicted for fraud, is a big believer in quid pro quo, and did similar actions in his first term.

Sometimes it really is about corruption.

replies(1): >>43597336 #
4. lenkite ◴[05 Apr 25 22:29 UTC] No.43597336{3}[source]▶
Changing the goal posts away from the inaugural funding, I see - because its fine for your side of the aisle - you have no standing there. It is now suddenly back to that horrific judgement by a partisan and corrupt judge whose daughter (Loren Merchan) was a highly-paid (multi-million) political consultant campaigning for Kamala Harris and where a misdemeanor was raised to a felony, then the felony was applied outside the standard five-year statute of limitations for felonies, the prosecution never proved which exact "unlawful means" (campaign finance, tax fraud, etc) Trump intended and where the jury was from Manhattan - which voted ~90% democrat and would have voted guilty for a non-democratic fart.

Sometimes it really is about extreme corruption.