←back to thread

545 points mmh0000 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bossyTeacher ◴[] No.43573002[source]
Cool tool but it shouldn't matter whether the client is a browser or not. I feel sad that we need such a tool in the real world
replies(2): >>43573216 #>>43573475 #
jimt1234 ◴[] No.43573475[source]
About six months ago I went to a government auction site that required Internet Explorer. Yes, Internet Explorer. The site was active, too; the auction data was up-to-date. I added a user-agent extension in Chrome, switched to IE, retried and it worked; all functionality on the site was fine. So yeah, I was both sad and annoyed. My guess is this government office paid for a website 25 years ago and it hasn't been updated since.
replies(2): >>43573634 #>>43574418 #
jorvi ◴[] No.43574418[source]
In South Korea, ActiveX is still required for many things like banking and government stuff. So they're stuck with both IE and the gaping security hole in it that is ActiveX.
replies(2): >>43575599 #>>43577975 #
asddubs ◴[] No.43577975[source]
is this still true? I know this was the case in the past, but even in 2025?
replies(1): >>43584326 #
1. kijin ◴[] No.43584326[source]
Not really. You can access any Korean bank or government website using Chrome, and they actually recommend Chrome these days.

They still want to install a bunch of programs on your computer, though. It's more or less the same stuff that used to be written as ActiveX extensions, but rewritten using modern browser APIs. :(