←back to thread

1503 points participant3 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
GPerson ◴[] No.43575114[source]
I just think it’s stealing, and honestly not that cool once you’ve seen it once or twice, and given the ramifications for humanity.
replies(2): >>43575162 #>>43575248 #
whycome ◴[] No.43575248[source]
The majority of human creation is like this. All language. Process. Even the US anthem was “stolen”
replies(3): >>43575675 #>>43576583 #>>43580637 #
GPerson ◴[] No.43580637[source]
Since you make no argument to justify your unfounded claim, I’ll simply respond by informing you that these (obviously) are not remotely similar. To claim they are indicates some kind of deep disrespect for your fellow human beings. You could not tell the difference between taking a screen shot of the Mona Lisa and spending a lifetime to perfect the art of painting and then putting years of effort into painting it.
replies(2): >>43583179 #>>43585273 #
1. shadowgovt ◴[] No.43583179[source]
People have also spent lifetimes perfecting the art of painting, putting years of effort in, and then used those talents to... Make sellable copies of the Mona Lisa. Ironically, since copyright has a time limit, that's not even illegal (so long as they do not claim they're original works of da Vinci). Nor is photographing it and selling the photograph. I'm not sure what argument you're making given the observations you've made (other than, perhaps, "There is a big gap between the mechanics of copyright and what it's supposed to accomplish," which I'd agree with).
replies(1): >>43588963 #
2. GPerson ◴[] No.43588963[source]
I respect those people quite a lot. A lot more than I respect the parasites and frauds filling out the machine learning department.