←back to thread

AI 2027

(ai-2027.com)
949 points Tenoke | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.628s | source
Show context
stego-tech ◴[] No.43578594[source]
It’s good science fiction, I’ll give it that. I think getting lost in the weeds over technicalities ignores the crux of the narrative: even if this doesn’t lead to AGI, at the very least it’s likely the final “warning shot” we’ll get before it’s suddenly and irreversibly here.

The problems it raises - alignment, geopolitics, lack of societal safeguards - are all real, and happening now (just replace “AGI” with “corporations”, and voila, you have a story about the climate crisis and regulatory capture). We should be solving these problems before AGI or job-replacing AI becomes commonplace, lest we run the very real risk of societal collapse or species extinction.

The point of these stories is to incite alarm, because they’re trying to provoke proactive responses while time is on our side, instead of trusting self-interested individuals in times of great crisis.

replies(10): >>43578747 #>>43579251 #>>43579927 #>>43580364 #>>43580681 #>>43581002 #>>43581238 #>>43581588 #>>43581940 #>>43582040 #
1. torginus ◴[] No.43581238[source]
The most amusing thing about is the unshakable belief that any part of humanity will be able to build a single nuclear reactor by 2027 to power datacenters, let alone a network of them.
replies(1): >>43588969 #
2. bronco21016 ◴[] No.43588969[source]
According to Wikipedia, China had 22 under construction as of 2023 for 24 GW of power. They have a goal of 150 by 2035.

I think they'll probably be able to finish at least 1-2 by 2027.