←back to thread

446 points walterbell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
BrenBarn ◴[] No.43577934[source]
It's become almost comical to me to read articles like this and wait for the part that, in this example, comes pretty close to the beginning: "This isn’t a rant against AI."

It's not? Why not? It's a "wake-up call", it's a "warning shot", but heaven forbid it's a rant against AI.

To me it's like someone listing off deaths from fentanyl, how it's destroyed families, ruined lives, but then tossing in a disclaimer that "this isn't a rant against fentanyl". In my view, the ways that people use and are drawn into AI usage has all the hallmarks of a spiral into drug addiction. There may be safe ways to use drugs but "distribute them for free to everyone on the internet" is not among them.

replies(12): >>43577939 #>>43577996 #>>43578036 #>>43578046 #>>43578066 #>>43578099 #>>43578125 #>>43578129 #>>43578304 #>>43578770 #>>43579016 #>>43579042 #
yapyap ◴[] No.43579016[source]
It’s not a rant against fentanyl, it’s a rant against irresponsible use of fentanyl.

Just like this is a rant against irresponsible use of AI.

Hope this helps

replies(1): >>43580322 #
1. johnisgood ◴[] No.43580322[source]
Yes, that makes much more sense.