(www.dutchosintguy.com)

446 points walterbell | 1 comments | 03 Apr 25 18:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.832s | source

Show context

jruohonen ◴[03 Apr 25 18:28 UTC] No.43573535[source]▶

"""

• Instead of forming hypotheses, users asked the AI for ideas.

• Instead of validating sources, they assumed the AI had already done so.

• Instead of assessing multiple perspectives, they integrated and edited the AI’s summary and moved on.

This isn’t hypothetical. This is happening now, in real-world workflows.

"""

Amen, and OSINT is hardly unique in this respect.

And implicitly related, philosophically:

cmiles74 ◴[03 Apr 25 22:16 UTC] No.43576137[source]▶

Anyone using these tools would do well to take this article to heart.

replies(1): >>43580016 #

1. mr_toad ◴[04 Apr 25 09:41 UTC] No.43580016[source]▶

I think there’s a lot of people who use these tools because they don’t like to read.

The slow collapse of critical thinking in OSINT due to AI