←back to thread

AI 2027

(ai-2027.com)
949 points Tenoke | 7 comments | 03 Apr 25 16:13 UTC | HN request time: 0.319s | source | bottom
Show context
stego-tech ◴[04 Apr 25 05:17 UTC] No.43578594[source]▶
It’s good science fiction, I’ll give it that. I think getting lost in the weeds over technicalities ignores the crux of the narrative: even if this doesn’t lead to AGI, at the very least it’s likely the final “warning shot” we’ll get before it’s suddenly and irreversibly here.

The problems it raises - alignment, geopolitics, lack of societal safeguards - are all real, and happening now (just replace “AGI” with “corporations”, and voila, you have a story about the climate crisis and regulatory capture). We should be solving these problems before AGI or job-replacing AI becomes commonplace, lest we run the very real risk of societal collapse or species extinction.

The point of these stories is to incite alarm, because they’re trying to provoke proactive responses while time is on our side, instead of trusting self-interested individuals in times of great crisis.

replies(10): >>43578747 #>>43579251 #>>43579927 #>>43580364 #>>43580681 #>>43581002 #>>43581238 #>>43581588 #>>43581940 #>>43582040 #
nroets ◴[04 Apr 25 07:24 UTC] No.43579251[source]▶
I fail to see how corporations are responsible for the climate crisis: Politicians won't tax gas because they'll get voted out.

We know that Trump is not captured by corporations because his trade policies are terrible.

If anything, social media is the evil that's destroying the political center: Americans are no longer reading mainstream newspapers or watching mainstream TV news.

The EU is saying the elections in Romania was manipulated through manipulation of TikTok accounts and media.

replies(3): >>43579424 #>>43579656 #>>43579796 #
baq ◴[04 Apr 25 07:57 UTC] No.43579424[source]▶
If you put a knife in someone’s heart, you’re the one who did it and ultimately you’re responsible. If someone told you to do it and you were just following orders… you still did it. If you say there were no rules against putting knives in other people’s hearts, you still did it and you’re still responsible.

If it’s somehow different for corporations, please enlighten me how.

replies(1): >>43579652 #
1. nroets ◴[04 Apr 25 08:29 UTC] No.43579652[source]▶
The oil companies are saying their product is vital to the economy and they are not wrong. How else will we get food from the farms to the store ? Ambulances to the hospitals ? And many, many other things.

Taxes are the best way to change behaviour (smaller cars driving less. Less flying etc). So government and the people who vote for them is to blame.

replies(4): >>43579699 #>>43579917 #>>43580618 #>>43581077 #
2. baq ◴[04 Apr 25 08:38 UTC] No.43579699[source]▶
I agree with everything here, we've had a great run of economic expansion for basically two centuries and I like my hot showers as much as anyone - but that doesn't change the CO2 levels.
3. fire_lake ◴[04 Apr 25 09:21 UTC] No.43579917[source]▶
What if people are manipulated by bot farms and think tanks and talking points supported by those corporations?

I think this view of humans - that they look at all the available information and then make calm decisions in their own interests - is simply wrong. We are manipulated all the damn time. I struggle to go to the supermarket without buying excess sugar. The biggest corporations in the world grew fat off showing us products to impulse buy before our more rational brain functions could stop us. We are not a little pilot in a meat vessel.

replies(1): >>43580363 #
4. nroets ◴[04 Apr 25 10:38 UTC] No.43580363[source]▶
Corporations would prefer lower corporate tax.

US corporate tax rates are actually every high. Partly due to the US having almost no consumption tax. EU members have VAT etc.

replies(1): >>43630970 #
5. matthewdgreen ◴[04 Apr 25 11:17 UTC] No.43580618[source]▶
There are politicians in multiple states trying to pass laws that slow down the deployment of renewable energy because they’re afraid if they don’t intervene it will be deployed too quickly and harm fossil fuel interests. Trump is promising to bring back coal, while he bans new wind leases. The whole “oil is the only way aw shucks people chose it” shtick is like a time capsule from 1990. That whole package of beliefs served its purpose and has been replaced with a muscular state-sponsored plan to defend fossil fuel interests even as they become economically obsolete and the rest of the world moves on.
6. brookst ◴[04 Apr 25 12:09 UTC] No.43581077[source]▶
The oil companies also knew and lied about global warming for decades. They paid and continue to pay for as science to stall action. I am completely mystified how you can find them blameless for venal politicians and a populace that largely believes their lies.
7. player1234 ◴[09 Apr 25 11:28 UTC] No.43630970{3}[source]▶
Did you know that VAT is spelled TARRIF in retard?